► Immigration Judge Anna Ho of Los Angeles; arrogant bully Print E-mail

Immigration Judge Anna Ho of Los Angeles; arrogant bully


The state of California presented Anna S. Ho with a law license in 1983 after she graduated from the University of West Los Angeles Law School, which is a Fourth tier school dedicated to serving losers that couldn’t get accepted at mainstream colleges like Pepperdine, UCLA, UC Davis or Stanford.


In 1995, former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno was duped into appointing Anna Ho as an immigration judge in the Seattle office. Anna didn’t get the appointment because she was the most qualified attorney in the Seattle area; she received it because she had proven to be a reliable lackey for the local political hacks.


Anna has proven to be one of the least qualified persons to ever sit as an Immigration Judge. On more than once occasion her incompetency has led to reversals emanating from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals based in San Francisco.


In the case of Rivera v. Attorney General Ashcroft, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Anna ordered the deportation of a US Citizen to Mexico after the mean presented his birth certificate to her proving he was in fact born in the U.S. of A. The Ninth Circuit condemned Anna for failing to act “as an impartial judge but rather as a prosecutor anxious to pick holes in the petitioner’s story.”


In the case of Cruz Rendon v. Attorney General Holder, the Ninth Circuit again reversed Anna’s denial of a cancellation of removal application for non-lawful permanent residents. The Ninth Circuit ruled that Anna’s refusal to grant a continuance for Rendon’s attorney to better prepare the cancellation case denied Ms. Rendon “a full and fair hearing.” The court further ruled that Anna was unreasonable in limiting Ms.  Rendon’s testimony regarding her son’s learning disabilities.


How is it possible that this serial loser is able to retain her position as an immigration judge when she tramples on the constitution by denying litigants their “due process” rights and treats many litigants with total disdain and/or outright contempt?


Every time Anna is reversed the Court of Appeals, the taxpayers end up getting hosed by being forced t o pay tens-of-thousands of dollars or even more for the process to wind its way through the appellate process and then back to Anna the Loser.



Who's Online

We have 105 guests online

Donation Request

Your donations are needed to help defray the recurring costs for internet services, cable access, research via LexisNexis, media subscriptions, and the employment of a researcher and editor.

Donate Here

The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Powered by Joomla!; Joomla templates by SG web hosting

website counter