Former Commissioner Wendy Harris of Pasadena, CA; moronic loser

The State of California presented Wendy M. Harris with a law license in 1994 after she graduated from the University of West Los Angeles School of Law. West LA University Law School is not an accredited ABA School and is primarily dedicated to accepting losers that could not qualify to attend law schools such as USC, UCLA or UC Davis.

As one would suspect, this wasn’t Wendy’s First bite at the Judicial Misfit Apple Tree. She was previously admonished for her poor temperament in the handling of another family law matter.

The Commission on Judicial Performance found Wendy guilty of engaging in the following misconduct.

• Failed to maintain professional competence in the law (moron)
• Misconduct was serious in nature
• Wendy never reviewed the mother’s request for a DVRO (Domestic Violence Restraining Order)
• Failed to ask any questions regarding substantive issues raised b the mother regarding domestic violence matter
• Failed to ask any questions regarding the child being sent out of state by the father in contravention of prior court orders  (even though the issue was raised in the moving papers of the mother
• Failed to ask the Child Abduction Unit to address the court regarding the father sending the child out of state even though they likely had highly relevant information
• Denied the mother a meaningful opportunity to explain the reasons why she had custody of her daughter, thereby giving the appearance of prejudgment and bias
• Wendy ended the court session by stating that she intend
• Without the submission of any additional evidence or any change in the evidence available to Wendy she changed her order and awarded sole legal and physical custody of the daughter to the father
• At both hearings, Wendy was discourteous, argumentative, impatient, and demeaning to the litigants, and appeared to be embroiled in the proceedings and that
• Wendy twice dismissed the Deputy District Attorneys present in court without any inquiry as to whether the Child Abduction Unit had any information relevant to the issues submitted to her
• Failed to accord every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding the full right to be heard according to law (aka, due process)
• Failed uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary
• Failed to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety
• Failed to respect and comply with the law (scofflaw)
• Failed to in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary
• Failed manage the courtroom in a manner that provides all litigants the opportunity to have their matters fairly adjudicated in accordance with the law

As a direct consequence of her misconduct, the enablers for Judicial Misfits sitting on the Commission on Judicial Performance by gifting her with a complimentary admonishment.

And lastly, it appears that Wendy is of the opinion that “due process” is how the grass becomes moist in the am.

As we speak (ca. October 2023) Wendy dispenses her so-called brand of law at 530 South Lake Avenue in Pasadena, California.