► Attorney Larry Klayman of DC; pervert, child molester |
Attorney Larry Klayman of DC; pervert, child molester
The state of Florida presented Larry Elliot Klayman with a law license in 1977 after he graduated from EmoryUniversityLawSchool.
Klayman is the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, which he laughingly claims is concerned about ethics in government and individual freedoms and liberties. In truth, Larry is a self-serving hypocrite who has earned millions attacking anyone who he considers to be a liberal.
For additional facts regarding Larry’s conduct, I would invite you to visit the following URL.
Attorney Larry Klayman of WashingtonDC; deadbeat loser
In July 1996, Larry married Stephanie Luck in Washington, D.C. The subsequently had two children during the marriage. In June 2003, Larry’s Luck (pun intended) ran out when Stephanie divorced him.
The divorce agreement called for Stephanie to have “legal and physical custody of the children and full control and supervision of their care, guidance, maintenance and education. Larry agreed to pay $1,800 a month in child support and $5,000 a year for the children’s private school education. The agreement further specified that Stephanie was moving to Cleveland with the children.
Subsequently, arguments arose over Klayman’s visitation with the children and his failure to pay child support. In 2007, a Virginia court found Klayman guilty of contempt for failing to pay $74,015 in child support. In order to purge the contempt, Larry paid the $74,015 plus interest and attorney fees.
Later on litigation arose in the Cuyahoga County Domestic Relations Court in Cleveland. Separate magistrates hearing the pending issues. One hearing the parenting issues, the other presided over child support matters. In regards to parenting issues, the magistrate granted Luck’s motion, imposed supervised visitation on Klayman, and order that he pay Luck $325,000 in attorney fees. In the child support case, the magistrate found Klayman in contempt of court.
Larry and Sexual Abuse of his children
The magistrate hearing the parenting issues heard evidence from the children’s pediatrician who reported allegations of sexual abuse to children services.
The magistrate pointed out that he was obligated to make his own independent analysis based upon the parties and the evidence before him. In doing so, he found on more than one occasions that Klayman acted in a grossly inappropriate manner with the children. The magistrate went on to say that Klayman’s conduct may not have been sexual in the sense that he intended to or did derive any sexual pleasure from it or that he intended his children would. That; however, does not mean that he did not engage in those acts or that his behavior was proper.
The magistrate further found it significant that although Klayman denied any allegations of sexual abuse, he never denied that he did not engage in inappropriate behavior with the children. The magistrate further found it notable that Klayman, “for all his breast beating about his innocence *** scrupulously avoided being questioned by anyone from children services or from the Sheriff’s Department about the allegations.” Even more disturbing to the magistrate was the fact that Klayman would not even answer the simple question regarding what he though inappropriate touching was. The magistrate stated that he could draw an adverse inference from Klayman’s decision not to testify to these matters because it was a civil proceeding and not criminal in nature.
Larry had the chutzpah to appeal the magistrate’s ruling to the 8th District Court of Appeals in Cleveland. That Court unanimously upheld the magistrate’s ruling by stating, “After reviewing the record, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling Klayman’s objections regarding the magistrate’s finding that Klayman inappropriately touched the children.”
As we speak (ca. February 2013) Larry the Perv practices at 2020 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, DC. |