► Attorney Gilles Doré of Montreal; victim of Arrogant Judiciary Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

Attorney Gilles Doré of Montreal; victim of Arrogant Judiciary

 
While he was arguing a client’s case before the Quebec Superior Court, the judge criticized Doré. Subsequently, Doré wrote a private letter to the judge calling him:
  • Loathsome and arrogant
  • Fundamentally unjust
  • Accused him of hiding behind his judicial status like a coward
  • Possessed a chronic inability to master any social skills
  • Accused him of being pedantic (pompous), aggressive and petty
  • Has a propensity to use his court to launch ugly, vulgar and mean personal attacks
Eventually the Barreau du Québec (Bar of Quebec) charged Doré with misconduct and suspended his law license for 21 days for violating the so-called Code of ethics of advocates.
 
Doré appealed the suspension on the grounds that it infringed his freedom of expression. As expected the Quebec Superior Court and Court of Appeals upheld the suspension.
 
Anyone that has dealt with the judiciary in Quebec or elsewhere is well aware that most of them are arrogant, unjust, pompous and incompetent. Therefore, Doré was merely speaking the truth.
 
To suggest that anyone, including lawyers and barristers should be required to show respect to someone that is totally unfit to don a robe is absurd. To punish someone for speaking the truth about a Judicial Misfit is totally unjust and nothing more than an ugly attempt by Canada’s judiciary to silence those who have the courage to speak the truth.
 

Who's Online

We have 205 guests online

Donation Request

Your donations are needed to help defray the recurring costs for internet services, cable access, research via LexisNexis, media subscriptions, and the employment of a researcher and editor.

Donate Here

The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Powered by Joomla!; Joomla templates by SG web hosting

website counter