► Judge Edward Miller of Greenville, SC; ethical gremlin Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

Judge Edward Miller of Greenville, SC; ethical gremlin

 

The State of South Carolina presented Edward Miller with a law license in 1978 after he graduated from North Carolina University School of Law.

 

The South Carolina General Assembly was duped into electing Eddie as a Greenville County Circuit Court Judge in 2002. Eddie didn’t receive the affirmative vote because he was the most qualified attorney in the greater Greenville area. He received it because he had proven to be a reliable lackey for the local political hacks.

 

In one matter, Brenda Bryant claimed that Eddie issued an “illegal” arrest warrant after she refused to pay roughly $10,000 in legal fees for a court-appointed guardian. Her complaint was first reported by The Nerve, a South Carolina online news outlet. (Joseph Cranney and Karim Doumar, The Post and Courier)

 

Ms. Bryant objected to the $10,000 in fees that Eddie awarded to the guardian ad litem that he personally appointed. Ms. Bryant went on to complain that the guardian had failed to protect her disabled daughter from physical and sexual abuse while housed in a Greenville group home.

 

Eddie’s arrest warrant has resulted in Ms. Bryant being targeted as a fugitive who is now being forced to live out of state thanks to Eddy.

 

In response to her ethics complaint, al that Ms. Bryant received was a three-paragraph proforma letter from the Commission on Judicial Conduct telling her what they’ve told the other 1,000 or more complainants over the last 20 or more years, we’ve “convened and voted to dismiss your complaint.”

 

Over the past twenty or so years, no judge in South Carolina has ever been found guilty of engaging in unethical and/or incompetent behavior. This unbelievable statistic makes Ivory Soap’s claim of being 99% is laughable at best. Moreover, it makes one believe that in comparison to the Ethical Purity of South Carolina’s judiciary, Ivory Soap is very unclean.

 

If the South Carolina Judiciary was really interested in exposing Judicial Misfits, it would not engage in blanket secrecy of their proceedings. Additionally, the makeup of the Judicial Commission guarantees favorable outcomes since of the 26 members, 14 are judges (majority) and 4 are attorneys.

 

Following the crass and unbelievably biased makeup of the Judicial Commission that results in no findings of misconduct would be the same if the South Carolina Legislature passed a law along the following lines in cases involving child molestation or claims of pedophilia.

  • Jury limited to male members only
  • All 12 male members of criminal jury required to be convicted child molesters

Now, Boys and Girls, do you think there would ever be a finding of guilty by this type of jury involving child molesters or pedophiles in South Carolina? My bad, stupid question, right?

 

As we speak (ca. May 2019), Eddie continues to sit as a Greenville County Circuit Court judge in Greenville, South Carolina.

 

 

Who's Online

We have 147 guests online

Donation Request

Your donations are needed to help defray the recurring costs for internet services, cable access, research via LexisNexis, media subscriptions, and the employment of a researcher and editor.

Donate Here

The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Powered by Joomla!; Joomla templates by SG web hosting

website counter