► Judge Brent Hall of Charleston, WV; ethical troll Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0

Judge Brent Hall of Charleston, WV; ethical troll


It should be noted that Brent is not a licensed attorney nor did he attend law school.


The West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission found Brent guilty of the following misconduct.

  • Failed to comply with the law
  • Conduct failed to promote public confidence in the judiciary
  • Abused the prestige of his  judicial office to advance his personal or economic interests or that of others, or allowed others to do so
  • Exhibited bias or prejudice in performance of judicial duties 
  • Allowed family, social, political, financial, or other interests or relationships to influence his conduct or judgment
  • Made public statement that reasonably was expected to affect outcome of or impair the fairness of a pending court matter
  • Participated in activities that interfered with proper performance of his judicial duties
  • Engaged in activities that would lead to frequent disqualifications
  • Participated in activities that would appear to a reasonable person to undermine his independence, integrity, or impartiality

As a direct consequence of his misconduct, the cheerleaders for Judicial Misfits sitting on the Judicial Investigation Committee punished Brent by gifting him with a complimentary admonition.


As we speak (ca. July 2018), Brent continues to sit as a Kanawha County Magistrate in Charleston, West Virginia.












Who's Online

We have 257 guests online

Donation Request

Your donations are needed to help defray the recurring costs for internet services, cable access, research via LexisNexis, media subscriptions, and the employment of a researcher and editor.

Donate Here

The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Powered by Joomla!; Joomla templates by SG web hosting

website counter